your future, yard donkey
Feb. 25th, 2007 10:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I haven't had time or energy to blodge much. Haven't been keeping up on other people, either.
My life is a blur of medical bullshit, entertainment news, unix sysadmin tasks, spyware, and spam. Lots and lots of spyware and spam. In lieu of telling you lots of boring details about this I will paste a typical reading item for me lately below.
Content analysis details: (28.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails
2.1 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1
0.4 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
4.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?80.181.195.106>]
1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
1.0 PART_CID_STOCK Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID)
1.0 PART_CID_STOCK_LESS Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID,
more specific)
1.0 STOCK_IMG_HTML Stock spam image part, with distinctive HTML
1.0 STOCK_IMG_HDR_FROM Stock spam image part, with distinctive From line
My life is a blur of medical bullshit, entertainment news, unix sysadmin tasks, spyware, and spam. Lots and lots of spyware and spam. In lieu of telling you lots of boring details about this I will paste a typical reading item for me lately below.
Content analysis details: (28.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails
2.1 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 BODY: TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1
0.4 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
1.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
4.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?80.181.195.106>]
1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: uaikq.hk]
1.0 PART_CID_STOCK Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID)
1.0 PART_CID_STOCK_LESS Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID,
more specific)
1.0 STOCK_IMG_HTML Stock spam image part, with distinctive HTML
1.0 STOCK_IMG_HDR_FROM Stock spam image part, with distinctive From line
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 06:32 am (UTC)W000T!
(I wonder if spammers chest-butt?)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 07:35 am (UTC)I hope things are okay with you and that the medical bullshit isn't too awful.
SpamAssassin
Date: 2007-02-26 10:32 am (UTC)Re: SpamAssassin
Date: 2007-02-26 05:23 pm (UTC)Also, I love that icon.
Re: SpamAssassin
Date: 2007-02-26 05:48 pm (UTC)re the user pic: it's great, isn't it. All credit to Kubrick, of course... it's his shot, after all ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 12:03 pm (UTC)Why not try out a Bayesian filter like Popfile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/)?
Once you've fed a Bayesian 1000 or so spam emails (so, like, a week's worth), it classifies spam with a better than 99.9% success rate.
I swear by it. It's not 100% perfect, but it works way better than... erm... certain spam filters installed by email providers.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 05:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 06:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-26 08:55 pm (UTC)It's great, especially if like me you have to run several mail servers and you don't want your users to get spammed.