NOW HEAR THIS
Feb. 14th, 2007 05:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The following is a fatwa or blogular bull about the word "tribal."
The word may still be used. However, the following rules apply:
The word may still be used. However, the following rules apply:
- It may not be used as a noun ("Justin has a tribal on his left thigh.")
- When used as an adjective, the word must refer to specific tribes or groups of tribes, as in: "Each of the chiefs heads his own tribal council" or "It is a tribal custom here to leave a little grain outside thet door for the spirits." Useage of the form "I guess they're really tribal there" or "I saw a show about some tribal people who ate yams" is forbidden. The word does not refer to brown-skinned people with insufficient pants who live in rural areas.
- There is no style of art or music that can or should be called "tribal." Each tribe within each culture has particular styles in the arts and they are all different from each other. The word does not refer to vaguely African or Native American patterns in art or rhythmic music. The music of the Israelite tribes, for example, is notably different from that of the Zulu. Useage such as "These tribal beat loops are gonna be great in my epic techno song" or "They're having a sale at Target on those tribal pattern shower curtains" is forbidden.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 01:49 am (UTC)For the first case ("Justin has a tribal on his left thigh.") I propose substituting the word "shithead", or "dumbshit" i.e. "Justin has a dumbshit on his left thigh." The same substitution could be more generally made to describe any kind of tattoo where the recipient does not speak the language s/he's been tattoo'd with...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 02:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 01:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 02:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 02:54 am (UTC)Please
Date: 2007-02-15 03:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 03:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 04:09 am (UTC)1. The word "caste" is probably more accurate for the idea you're trying to get a cross, you anthropological nitwit.
2. If you really were part of my "tribe" the leaders would bind you to a tree so the wolves or crows or whatever can eat you, after which the useful remaining members of the tribe would travel to the next hunting ground.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 07:14 am (UTC)Once, during a particularly tense meeting with a particularly stupid consultant, she leveled her gaze at this twit and said, "You know, if we'd been having this meeting 50 years ago, I'd have eaten you by now."
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 05:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 05:28 pm (UTC)The trouble with tribals
Date: 2007-02-15 06:54 pm (UTC)So aside from the bellydance exception, I totally agree with you 100%. Every time I hear "a tribal," my skin crawls. Those people should be made to say "tribble" instead.
Re: The trouble with tribals
Date: 2007-02-15 08:13 pm (UTC)Re: The trouble with tribals
Date: 2007-02-17 08:40 am (UTC)Please allow exceptions for "urban tribal"
Date: 2007-02-15 06:02 pm (UTC)This is a classic descriptivist verses prescriptivist rant. However being a bit of a fusspot myself, I must side with the substitute's guidelines.
I reserve the right to continue using "urban tribal" to refer to clueless jackasses that are chronically under-utilized (for my nefarious schemes anyway).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-15 08:12 pm (UTC)I believe you are all missing the main point here
Date: 2007-02-15 08:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-17 02:31 pm (UTC)That's several Sergio Aragones panels conjured up right there.
(With some chimps watching, one of which is uttering the word "vootie".
Tribal
Date: 2007-02-18 04:55 pm (UTC)