substitute: (Default)
[personal profile] substitute
A restaurant, the name of which is formed by making a possessive out of a noun not traditionally used as a given name, but which is descriptive or evocative of the restaurant's food or entertainment or the ethnic group which produces said food, will be a bad restaurant. Examples: Chili's, TGI Friday's, Taquito's. Corollary: A restaurant named similarly but with a plural instead of a possessive will be more expensive and marginally better, but rarely worth it. Examples: Plums, Scallions, Tapas. Second corollary: Any business named in the former naming category is sure to be an unpleasant franchise and should be avoided. Example: Tire's Warehouse.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 12:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nyxie.livejournal.com
Here's a Canadian chain to add to the list of crap that conforms to these rules:

http://www.milestonesrestaurants.com/
(warning: Bad music on website)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stimps.livejournal.com
And the occasional actual possessive version, like Vij's, which is great. =)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 06:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] substitute.livejournal.com
actual possessives are usually great!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 02:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/__procession/
i really like plums! :( in fact, i took [livejournal.com profile] burntcurtis there for brunch yesterday morning. they also have a grilled romaine-heart/apple/walnut/gorgonzola salad that is just really, really killer.

on another note, i missed actually meeting you vis-a-vis again this weekend! i'll be around again next weekend, though. we should get coffffeeeee!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 06:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] substitute.livejournal.com
It's overpriced for me, but the food is okay.

Hmm.. do you exist? or was that a dummy in the car?

vis-a-vis

Date: 2006-08-01 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrhinelander.livejournal.com
That's an unimpeachable use of vis-a-vis.

Some time ago I decided that it's too hard for me to decide when (ever?) it's proper to use vis-a-vis to mean "with respect to," so I stopped, and for many years I've made myself say "with respect to" exclusively in that context.

Your post reminds me that I also gave up the perfectly sensible way to use vis-a-vis that you used! So, well, thanks.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catamorphism.livejournal.com
You don't like Plums? Sacrilege! I've never had a more delicious Dutch baby.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 06:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] substitute.livejournal.com
I had exactly that one of the few times I went there. It was indeed very good, but was about 500 g of sugar and fat. I thought I was going to die.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-01 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catamorphism.livejournal.com
Death has never been more tasty!

Profile

substitute: (Default)
substitute

May 2009

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 456 78 9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags