substitute: (heavens gate)
I got a chain letter which I will not reproduce here about how the spinach is just fine and it's a big conspiracy and no one is really getting sick from the spinach and it's the evil spinach-hating anti-raw-food forces spreading the lies about the virtuous spinach because "they" don't want you to eat nice raw healthy spinach and live forever.

It was sent from a local raw food place which may well make very nice food themselves but will never get a goddamn dime from me after seeing this. Thanks for the dangerous tinfoil hat bullshit, goodmoodcafe.com

Please don't forward crap like this. It's not "just another side to the story." It's deadly paranoid garbage.

It's bad enough that this country is trashing its public health infrastructure and letting Big Agriculture "regulate" itself. Let's not make things worse. Hundreds of underpaid and underappreciated scientists and public health experts are working 24 hours a day to trace the source of this and every other food-borne disease outbreak and save lives. Calling them liars is nasty and irresponsible.

There is no anti-spinach conspiracy. If you want safer food, pay attention to things like this and why they happen. Super E. Coli bacteria exist because of brain-dead factory farming, and they get into the food because big food corporations wrote the laws that say they can wipe their asses on your food if they feel like it.

There's your conspiracy and it's right out in the open.
substitute: (lamers)
[livejournal.com profile] flata points out that some people lost their heads because the all-knowing government spy agency, the NSA, put cookies on people's computers.

A "privacy advocate" named Daniel Brandt is upset about this, and has previously been upset about the CIA using persistent cookies on their public website.

I feel sorry for the web monkey who put those in for whatever boring typical reason people use persistent cookies, because that person is in big trouble. I also think that a "no persistent cookies" policy for websites of this kind is a fine idea, almost entirely because it reduces this kind of pointless paranoia. But let's get real, here. You can turn off cookies, and anyone who's serious about privacy does. There's no way the NSA is using persistent cookies to track individual website visitors; that's inane.

Danny boy, the NSA has shit you don't even know about, probably archiving the entire Internet way better than Alexa and analyzing it and putting it in databases and crunching it up to find Al-Qaeda and screw the Chinese. They don't need "cookies", okay? Oh, and by the way, you keep mispelling "rendez-vous" in your emails to your mistress, the one in Dayton. Get that shit straight, okay?

This was almost as "good" as the podjacking idiot.

Profile

substitute: (Default)
substitute

May 2009

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 456 78 9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags