Our tribe does not permit this; tabu.
Mar. 26th, 2003 10:53 pmhttp://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/docket/2002/march.html#02-102
Grab a pot of coffee and Acrobat reader and have yourself a big bowl of sexual politics. The Amicus Curiae response in favor of the Texas sodomy law are some fine reading, brought to me courtesy the Psychoceramics mailing list.
Personally I'm not interested in having any sodomy in Texas or elsewhere, so it's academic for me. But I'm fascinated by the loopy reasoning some people have for wanting to prohibit it by law.
Grab a pot of coffee and Acrobat reader and have yourself a big bowl of sexual politics. The Amicus Curiae response in favor of the Texas sodomy law are some fine reading, brought to me courtesy the Psychoceramics mailing list.
Personally I'm not interested in having any sodomy in Texas or elsewhere, so it's academic for me. But I'm fascinated by the loopy reasoning some people have for wanting to prohibit it by law.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-26 11:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-26 11:23 pm (UTC)Some of those documents get really, really wacky.
That's a rather tender subject...another slice?
Date: 2003-03-27 12:47 am (UTC)According to an online version of Black's, sodomy is any "unnatural" sex act, including man/man, woman/woman, and human/animal. It says nothing about oral sex, but I could see how a conservative court might rule it as a crime against nature. Does lumping together gay sex with beastiality strike anyone else as too broad a definition?!
---standard boilerplate...blah, blah, my own opinions, blah, blah, not a professional, blah, blah, closed course professional driver, blah, blah...
Re: That's a rather tender subject...another slice?
Date: 2003-03-27 10:59 am (UTC)