substitute: (Default)
[personal profile] substitute
Per http://selectsmart.com/PHILOSOPHY I match up best with those below. That's cool. Kinda what I expected. I can be more conservative than I look. Grin.

1. Ockham (100%) Click here for info
2. Spinoza (97%) Click here for info
3. Aquinas (95%) Click here for info
4. Epicureans (94%) Click here for info
5. Augustine (93%) Click here for info
6. Mill (86%) Click here for info
7. Kant (84%) Click here for info
8. Noddings (63%) Click here for info
9. Prescriptivism (63%) Click here for info
10. Sartre (61%) Click here for info
11. Bentham (59%) Click here for info
12. Hobbes (39%) Click here for info
13. Nietzsche (39%) Click here for info
14. Aristotle (38%) Click here for info
15. Cynics (36%) Click here for info
16. Stoics (27%) Click here for info
17. Rand (24%) Click here for info
18. Hume (22%) Click here for info
19. Plato (14%) Click here for info

Uh...

Date: 2002-12-26 01:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zebulon-y.livejournal.com
1.Kant   (100%)  Click here for info
2.Mill   (98%)  Click here for info
3.Prescriptivism   (89%)  Click here for info
4.Aquinas   (72%)  Click here for info
5.Bentham   (69%)  Click here for info
6.Sartre   (64%)  Click here for info
7.Spinoza   (56%)  Click here for info
8.Rand   (52%)  Click here for info
9.Augustine   (50%)  Click here for info
10.Stoics   (50%)  Click here for info
11.Epicureans   (47%)  Click here for info
12.Plato   (42%)  Click here for info
13.Noddings   (41%)  Click here for info
14.Aristotle   (41%)  Click here for info
15.Ockham   (35%)  Click here for info
16.Cynics   (17%)  Click here for info
17.Hume   (11%)  Click here for info
18.Hobbes   (9%)  Click here for info
19.Nietzsche   (6%)  Click here for info


Okay, um, while it's been a while, isn't it a little nonsensical to be rated as Kantian with Mill immediately following?

Also: I would have expected Hume to be much higher, although then again this was almost all ethics questions

Also Also: Nieztsche can suck the fat one

Re: Uh...

Date: 2002-12-26 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loose-joints.livejournal.com
That struck me as really odd too, not just with your journal; but that Kant and Mill or Kant and Bentham, for that matter would have so much overlap. I don't think it's possible to agree 100% with Kant and 90% with any utilitarian. One would have simultaneously hold that intent and outcome are the most important thing when evaluating right action.

Profile

substitute: (Default)
substitute

May 2009

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 456 78 9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags