turbans at the annex: serious business
Feb. 3rd, 2008 02:02 amOur local lame bar, Pierce Street Annex, has revised their policies to allow turbans in the bar, after a Sikh complained and asked for an apology.
The article says: "Sanjum Paul Singh Samagh, 24, accompanied friends to the Pierce Street Annex bar last year, only to be turned away because his turban was deemed to conflict with a rule prohibiting hats."
Good, he can enter with his turban now.
What's not mentioned is why bars ban hats: it's to keep out black guys. American black guys almost always wear a hat going out at night. It's an old, known technique for keeping their presence to a minimum. It's similar to gay bars banning open-toed shoes "for safety" to keep down the number of women who show up to dance with gay guys.
For some time now, Pierce Street has been a destination for black guys from Riverside County who drive out here to be in Newport/Mesa instead of Riverside. I guess the management decided there were too many of them.
Bars are just a disaster in Southern California. Everyone drives home, and a bar can't make money unless you have at least two drinks, so the entire business relies on drunk driving. And then they make desperate attempts to keep a money-making "demographic" in the bar, which they can only achieve by violating discrimination laws and acting like assholes.
I liked the bars in SF and NY, where you could walk home if you wanted. I bet they have similar issues with the "mix of the crowd" though.
The article says: "Sanjum Paul Singh Samagh, 24, accompanied friends to the Pierce Street Annex bar last year, only to be turned away because his turban was deemed to conflict with a rule prohibiting hats."
Good, he can enter with his turban now.
What's not mentioned is why bars ban hats: it's to keep out black guys. American black guys almost always wear a hat going out at night. It's an old, known technique for keeping their presence to a minimum. It's similar to gay bars banning open-toed shoes "for safety" to keep down the number of women who show up to dance with gay guys.
For some time now, Pierce Street has been a destination for black guys from Riverside County who drive out here to be in Newport/Mesa instead of Riverside. I guess the management decided there were too many of them.
Bars are just a disaster in Southern California. Everyone drives home, and a bar can't make money unless you have at least two drinks, so the entire business relies on drunk driving. And then they make desperate attempts to keep a money-making "demographic" in the bar, which they can only achieve by violating discrimination laws and acting like assholes.
I liked the bars in SF and NY, where you could walk home if you wanted. I bet they have similar issues with the "mix of the crowd" though.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 10:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 10:21 am (UTC)I also don't think black guys wear any more hats than white guys, at least not wherever I've lived/where I've gone.
That said, and all racial issues aside, I tend to frequent places that should have more of dress code if anything!
c.f. DNA's pukey asian nights...
Date: 2008-02-03 10:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 11:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 11:11 am (UTC)Again though, most of the places I drink at frequently don't tend to discriminate on any basis whatsoever as long as you don't lay your head down upon the bar and go to sleep, and even then it's generally forgiven, so my view is somewhat limited.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 01:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 02:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 05:46 pm (UTC)People who frequent that place scare me, a lot. I think I told you about how they kept planting new saplings on Karen's street because the people from that bar would show up drunk at 2 am and break them in half. Like, for fun.
Also, parking on other people's lawns is not ok. Not even when you need a drink real bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 07:15 pm (UTC)Yeah, that's the best part of going out here in NYC... drunk subway rides home. Er, not the rides, but the fact that one can get home wasted.
the management reserves the right to refuse service
Date: 2008-02-03 07:16 pm (UTC)NO BAGGY PANTS
NO BOOTS
NO REALLY BIG GOLD CHAINS
NO T-SHIRTS WITH A CHILD'S PICTURE ON THEM AND TWO DATES, NO MORE THAN TWENTY YEARS APART, SEPARATED BY A HYPHEN
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 07:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-03 10:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-04 05:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-04 06:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-04 06:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-04 08:38 pm (UTC)(What the hell was my friend doing in El Centro in the first place? Playing a gig with his band. Not in the bar that barred his entry, though--too bad, because that would have been a really fun twist to the tale.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-05 12:16 am (UTC)Zhigaag
Date: 2008-02-07 10:34 pm (UTC)In Chicago: get a bit buzzed, or actually pretty buzzed; go to the El platform
and sober up a bit from the cold as you're waiting; and then
hop on the next El home. Just try not to nod off (the train rocks you soothingly) and end up missing your stop and/or transfer point.
Oddly: I never saw anyone, no matter how drunk, puzzling over which El route to take home.
Everyone that I saw could navigate the system practically by muscle memory.
* * *
However, out in the El-less suburbs, where the street grid is practically tiled with "sports bars", look out. They call it "Chicagoland", but I'd bet that it's more like a DUI Alphaville.