(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-27 01:20 am (UTC)
I agree. It's not that the open source model means anything bad at all. There are non-free journals that people in a particular field do not respect because they have poor peer review policies or other flaws.

Considering what's at stake, I want to be careful about results from *any* journal with both a brand new model for academic publishing and a study result that changes so much, in a way that so many people will find vindicating.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

substitute: (Default)
substitute

May 2009

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 456 78 9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags