I got it. I realized after reading your analysis that I had seen the original cartoon long ago, forgotten this fact, and that now I had thought that EVERYBODY had seen the cartoon. Furthermore, I thought this was a knockoff of the original cartoon (which EVERYBODY had seen, remember), with an updated caption which was diagnostic that it was not a New Yorker cartoon. So it must be a knockoff, see.
The net was that I thought it was a VERY funny update. But, after reading the analysis, and thinking through my tortuous reaction, I now think that it's too internet-savvy to be generally funny. Like, on the Onion, but not in the New Yorker.
And I bet I'm wrong. I haven't read (i.e., thumb through the cartoons of) a New Yorker in a few years.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 01:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 07:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Moof
Date: 2006-08-30 10:27 pm (UTC)Re: Moof
From:So sudden was my chorf
From:Re: So sudden was my chorf
From:nice
Date: 2006-08-31 03:07 am (UTC)The net was that I thought it was a VERY funny update. But, after reading the analysis, and thinking through my tortuous reaction, I now think that it's too internet-savvy to be generally funny. Like, on the Onion, but not in the New Yorker.
And I bet I'm wrong. I haven't read (i.e., thumb through the cartoons of) a New Yorker in a few years.