substitute (
substitute) wrote2006-09-04 02:51 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
didja hear didja hear didja hear
There should be a word for news items which you know, the moment you see them, will be all over your LiveJournal and blogroll and feeds for the next 48-72 hours and will then become part of the permanent library of events referred to in these media.
Not "meme" but something that is more specifically limited to stories reported in mass media. Examples have varied in real-world importance from gigantic world-changing disasters or triumphs of good over evil down to pointless "oddly enough," but there's some characteristic quality that I can't identify here that makes me say "well, I'll be seeing this shit on my friends page for a while now" when I see it.
My guess at the moment is that certain stories flick a switch that makes us say "I must tell others about this and talk about it" that is independent of any judgment about the importance of the story or the likelihood that you'll be the first to tell anyone about it. I bet if they ever localize this thing in the brain it'll be in the same nerve bundle as whatever makes us talk about the weather.
The item that sparked this line of thought was of course today's death of a minor celebrity, which is almost entirely at the trivial end of the scale, only escaping the "oddly enough" silliness because it involves one actual death of a human.
Not "meme" but something that is more specifically limited to stories reported in mass media. Examples have varied in real-world importance from gigantic world-changing disasters or triumphs of good over evil down to pointless "oddly enough," but there's some characteristic quality that I can't identify here that makes me say "well, I'll be seeing this shit on my friends page for a while now" when I see it.
My guess at the moment is that certain stories flick a switch that makes us say "I must tell others about this and talk about it" that is independent of any judgment about the importance of the story or the likelihood that you'll be the first to tell anyone about it. I bet if they ever localize this thing in the brain it'll be in the same nerve bundle as whatever makes us talk about the weather.
The item that sparked this line of thought was of course today's death of a minor celebrity, which is almost entirely at the trivial end of the scale, only escaping the "oddly enough" silliness because it involves one actual death of a human.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm amused he was not killed by a crocodile. That he was killed by a terrible animal attack while filming one of his trademark risky nature docs was simply to be expected.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I guess there are more parallels than I'd like between Irwin and a soldier killed in battle -- they both presumably know what they are getting into and fairly delibrately poke at the Beast with a stick and deal with the consequences. The big difference is that this poor sod has no name, probably never saw it coming, and at no time collected a fat cheque for mugging at the camera and shouting, "Crikey!" just as the Afghani car bomb goes off.
no subject
no subject
The rest should stfu.
no subject
Of course I feel no need to report the news on my journal. I just assume that my friends read the news once a day.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I won't be surprised at all if the 'no swimswim wetem crocodile' sign in Vanua Lava is the site of a minor shrine as a result.
Seriously.
no subject
How is that a bad thing?
no subject
I hereby propose that a piece of information used as a tool for social grooming be referred to as a "greme."
no subject
But after mulling over variations on the word "cluster", I've got it: "clump dump".